|
Fall 2005

|
|

 |
| RISING FUEL COSTS—The energy bill passed by Congress over
the summer failed to increase fuel efficiency standards in order
to save consumers money at the gas pump and make the country
less reliant on oil. |

As the price of oil passed the $60
per barrel mark for the first time
ever and gas prices soared, Congress
debated major changes to the
nation’s energy policy.
While lawmakers considered hundreds
of proposals, their decision
boiled down to which vision of the
nation’s future they embraced.
One vision would have us seek
out more oil and gas from scant
domestic supplies—not enough to
reduce our dependence on foreign
oil, and only at considerable cost to
our health and environment.
Another vision offers the opportunity
to transition to an economy
powered by more diverse, cleaner,
renewable sources of energy and
increased energy efficiency.
Despite the best efforts of Georgia
PIRG and others, Congress made
the wrong choice on July 29 when it
passed the president’s energy bill.
Congressional leaders excluded
two Georgia PIRG-backed, Senate approved
provisions—a goal of 10
percent clean energy by 2020 and a
goal of reducing oil dependence by
one million barrels a day.
“Washington’s failure to make the
right energy choices only emphasizes
the importance of leadership
and action in the states,” said Georgia
PIRG Advocate Jill Johnson.
In Georgia, state legislators passed
a bill to create a sales tax holiday for energy-efficient appliances in
October.
State researchers are also studying
offshore wind power opportunities.
“The national energy bill is a major
setback, no doubt,” said Johnson.
“But the larger debate over the
nation’s energy future is far from
over.” |